Probate Law Blog
Houston Probate Attorney
There are a number of challenges an executor can face in administering an estate. Will contests are an example. These disputes can be particularly troubling if they are filed after the estate has been administered and the probate assets have been distributed. The court recently considered this fact pattern in Estate of Perez-Muzza No. 04-16-00755-CV (Tex. App.-San Antonio 2018).
Facts & Procedural History
The facts and procedural history in this case are as follows:
1. The decedent passed in 2007. Seven months prior, she had executed a will leaving everything to her nephew and appointing her nephew as the independent executor.
2. The decedent’s will was admitted to probate in December of 2007. The nephew administered the probate estate and distributed the assets. The probate court approved the final accounting in August of 2008.
3. In December of 2009, a family member filed a will contest alleging that the will was not properly executed.
The probate litigation continued for several years, culminating in an appeal filed by the nephew. The appeal involved whether the will contest should be allowed even though it was not started until after the estate was administered and the probate assets distributed.
The Time for Filing a Will Contest
The time for bringing a will contest is a logical place to start in considering this case.
Texas law says that an action to contest the validity of a will has to be brought within two years from the date the will is admitted to probate by the trial court.
In this case, the will was admitted to probate in December of 2007 and the will contest was commenced in December 2009–with two days remaining on the two year statute of limitations. So the will contest was timely, even though it wasn’t necessarily fair given that the probate assets had already been distributed and the family member was aware of this.
The Laches Affirmative Defense
The probate courts have various equitable powers that allow the courts to correct injustices. This includes the laches doctrine.
Laches is an affirmative defense. It is raised by a defendant in a lawsuit. The court described laches as follows:
The affirmative defense of laches precludes a plaintiff from asserting a legal or equitable right after an unreasonable delay against a defendant who has changed his position in good faith and to his detriment because of the delay. Doncaster v. Hernaiz, 161 S.W.3d 594, 603 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 2005, no pet.).
If successful, the court dismisses the plaintiff’s claim based on laches. In this case, this would mean that the will contest would be dismissed.
The court noted that Texas law requires extraordinary circumstances for laches to apply in situations, like a will contest suit, where state law provides a time for bringing suit. More specifically, laches only applies in these situations where extraordinary circumstances would result in a grave injustice.
Is Laches a Valid Defense to a Will Contest?
The court had to decide whether laches was a valid defense to a will contest.
The nephew argued that laches applied and that his administering the estate and distributing the estate assets constituted an extraordinary circumstance.
The court determined that there was nothing extraordinary about these facts or that there was a grave injustice if the plaintiff continued her will contest suit.
The court seemed to acknowledge that this result may have been different if there was more evidence that the probate assets had been distributed to a third party, such as the IRS or other beneficiaries. The court didn’t feel that there was sufficient evidence of this in this particular case. This leaves the door open to the laches defense for other cases.
Do you need help with a probate matter in Houston or the surrounding area? We are Houston probate attorneys. We help clients navigate the probate process. Call today for a free confidential consultation, (832) 915-1040.